Renault Megane RS sport chassis 2020 review – forget the Trophy, basic is best with the Megane RS

With a softer set-up than the Trophy and Cup, Renault Sport’s basic Megane could be the pick of the range

Rating
star-4.5
Pro
Engaging engine, flowing chassis, great value
Con
Most people will unknowingly pick the Trophy

The Trophy-R might grab the headlines with its exotic specification and similarly exotic price tag, but Renault Sport’s products have often been their best at their most accessible.

With the latest-generation Renault Sport Mégane, that means ignoring Trophies and models equipped with the sharper Cup chassis, and starting with the $36,940 Megane 280 and its standard ‘Sport’ chassis.

That presents a conundrum, as the best RS models have also rarely been the absolute entry point to their respective ranges – the outgoing Clio RS only really began to fulfil its potential in 220 Trophy form, while the bustle-backed second-generation Mégane was never up to much as the original 225.

If there’s a hope for the basic 280, it’s that the Trophy and Trophy-R have, for all their pace, struggled on some of Britain’s bumpier surfaces. With a softer set-up and a dose less aggression, could this make the basic RS the pick of the range?

Engine, performance and 0-100 time

Sitting at the bottom of the Renault Sport Mégane range doesn’t mean a shortage of firepower, even if the Trophy and Trophy-R offer more. The 1.8-litre turbocharged four-cylinder – much like you’ll also find in the Alpine A110 sports car – makes 276bhp at 6000rpm, with a 288lb ft torque plateau between 2400 and 4800rpm giving the RS a healthy mid-range.

A six-speed manual gearbox is standard fitment, though a dual-clutch automatic is also available. Renault’s EDC ’box is better than it used to be (it was one of our big gripes with the Clio RS) but despite our previous experiences with the Mégane’s slightly notchy manual, it’s still the one we’d choose.

With only 1407kg to haul around, making it among the lighter cars in this class, the 280 dispatches the 0-100kph dash in 5.8sec (identical to a Honda Civic Type R), and bounces into a 250kph limiter at the top end.

Technical highlights

The Mégane RS shares its basic chassis with that of the Trophy and Trophy-R above it, but in standard ‘Sport’ specification it gets smaller wheels with slimmer tyres – 18 inches in diameter, with 235/40 rubber to the Cup chassis cars’ 19s with 245/35s – while you lose the Cup’s stiffer suspension and Torsen limited-slip differential.

It retains Renault’s ‘4Control’ all-wheel-steering set-up though, capable of turning the rear wheels in either the same direction or the opposite direction to the fronts depending on dynamic requirements, while the 280 also gets the hydraulic bump-stops used across the RS range.

What’s it like to drive?

This could be the Mégane RS we’ve been waiting for, and it’s been under our noses all the time. Where the Trophies we’ve driven until now have been exciting but also fidgeted, skipped and required concentration on rougher surfaces, the basic 280 flows, works with the surface and feels natural.

In many ways it feels like a front-drive version of the Alpine A110. The engine helps, of course – the 1.8-litre unit feels similarly free-revving, and the Mégane’s extra punch offsets the hatchback’s extra weight over its coupe cousin. It might be one of the best current hot hatch power plants – tack-sharp, a joy to spin to the limiter, great to listen to, and properly fast.

The manual gearshift is still quite notchy and its lever an awkward shape, but once you’ve learned it you can whip through changes as quickly as your arm will move, while the pedals are well-spaced for heel-and-toe. Good brakes, too, with better progression than the carbon discs of the Trophy-R.

But it’s the chassis that most evokes the Alpine. While it lacks the cast-iron body control of the Cup chassis cars, there’s still plenty of control, and on the smaller wheels and taller tyres its behaviour over smaller, higher-frequency bumps is calmer than before. There’s an Alpine-style bob and float over certain undulations, but it never gets out of hand and never feels like it’ll come back to bite you mid-corner.

The steering too has the easy, light feel of the A110. Its messages are subtle, but the response is up there with any current hot hatch. Even the four-wheel steering feels more natural, perhaps because the extra suspension movement takes the edge off those quick, unsettling movements at the rear axle. It’d be intriguing to try one with the Trophy-R’s simpler set-up, but there’s a risk that would compromise the 280’s lovely cohesive flow.

You’ll rarely want for more grip, with the Mégane’s wide track and 235-section tyres still giving the car great turn-in and fantastic mid-corner grip, and while traction out of hairpins or hard driving on track might show up the lack of a limited-slip diff, the 280’s front end is far from unruly.

As an aside, there was also unanimity among the team over the Mégane’s seats on our recent hot hatch megatest. They’re better positioned and more comfortable than the Trophy’s Recaros, and the grippy cloth surface and squared-off bolsters look great, too.

Price and rivals

The Megane 280 currently starts at $36,940, which seems like spectacular value given its abilities. The identically powerful Ford Focus ST – one of the most affordable cars in its class in its last generation – starts at $41,770, while even the well-priced Hyundai i30 N Performance, which only narrowly beat the Mégane in our megatest, comes in at $38,505. The Honda Civic Type R, winner of that test and still our favourite hot hatchback, begins at $41,190.

Perhaps the most relevant comparison is Renault’s own Mégane Trophy, which starts at $42,160. While not excessive for the class, that now seems like a lot of money to pay over the 280 for a car that’s arguably worse on the roads where hot hatchbacks should excel.

We’d instead spend some of the difference on some appropriate paintwork – Liquid Yellow comes in at $1775 – and maybe adding the Trophy’s Alcantara steering wheel ($325).

This article originally appeared at evo.co.uk

Copyright © evo UK, Dennis Publishing

Categories: EVO

,,,,

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.